Give us a call

3 Interesting Devices That Failed


Innovation in the world of technology is a double-edged sword. While it often leads to groundbreaking devices that revolutionize our lives, it also brings with it a fair share of failures.

This article explores three intriguing devices that, despite their promise and potential, failed to capture the market and eventually faded into obscurity. These failures serve as cautionary tales in the ever-evolving world of technology.

Google Glass: A Vision Ahead of Its Time

n 2013, Google made a bold foray into the world of wearable technology with the launch of Google Glass.

Marketed as smart eyewear, Google Glass was a futuristic device that aimed to provide users with a heads-up display, hands-free access to information, and the ability to capture photos and videos effortlessly.

At its core, Google Glass was an exciting concept, allowing users to browse the internet, check emails, and access maps through a small display mounted on their eyeglasses. It also featured voice control, enabling users to interact with the device without using their hands.


Despite its innovative design and capabilities, Google Glass faced several significant challenges:

  1. Privacy Concerns: One of the biggest hurdles for Google Glass was privacy concerns. The device’s built-in camera raised concerns about surreptitious recording and photography in public spaces, leading to a backlash from businesses and individuals alike.
  2. High Price Tag: Google Glass came with a hefty price tag, making it inaccessible to the average consumer. Priced at $1,500, it was considered a luxury item rather than a practical tool.
  3. Limited Use Cases: The device struggled to find meaningful use cases beyond novelty. While it was marketed as a tool for professionals like doctors and engineers, it failed to gain widespread adoption in these industries.


In 2015, Google announced that it was halting the consumer version of Google Glass, acknowledging its shortcomings and need for further development.

However, Google Glass has found a second life in enterprise applications, where it has been adopted for tasks like hands-free inventory management and remote assistance.

Betamax: The Losing Format War

In the late 1970s, the home video recording industry witnessed a fierce format war between two competing technologies: Betamax, developed by Sony, and VHS (Video Home System), developed by JVC.

Betamax, introduced in 1975, boasted superior video quality compared to VHS, which led many early adopters to choose it as their preferred format.

Betamax’s technical advantages included sharper image quality and better audio fidelity, making it a hit among videophiles. However, despite its technical superiority, Betamax faced several challenges that ultimately led to its downfall:

  1. Limited Recording Time: Betamax tapes could only record for one hour, whereas VHS offered two hours. This shorter recording time limited Betamax’s appeal for recording longer programs, such as movies or sporting events.
  2. Higher Cost: Betamax machines were more expensive than VHS players, making them less attractive to cost-conscious consumers.
  3. Lack of Content: VHS garnered more support from movie studios and content producers, leading to a larger library of available tapes. This gave VHS a significant advantage in the battle for consumer attention.


The format war raged on for several years, but by the early 1980s, it became clear that VHS was gaining the upper hand. Retailers began phasing out Betamax tapes and machines, and rental stores favored VHS titles.

In 1988, Sony officially discontinued Betamax production for the consumer market, marking the end of a format that had once held so much promise.

Microsoft Zune: A Failed Attempt to Rival the iPod

In 2006, Microsoft took aim at Apple’s dominance in the portable media player market with the launch of the Zune. The Zune was marketed as a worthy competitor to the iPod, offering a sleek design, a large color screen, and wireless sharing capabilities.

While the Zune had its merits, it faced several challenges that hindered its success:

  1. Late Entry: By the time the Zune was released, the iPod had already established itself as the market leader. Microsoft faced an uphill battle trying to convince consumers to switch from their beloved iPods to a new and unproven device.
  2. Limited Ecosystem: The Zune was closely tied to the Zune Marketplace, Microsoft’s digital media store, which had a smaller catalog compared to Apple’s iTunes. This limited content availability for Zune users.
  3. Incompatibility: The Zune’s wireless sharing feature, which allowed users to share songs with nearby Zune devices, was hampered by its limited compatibility. Only Zune-to-Zune sharing was supported, making it less useful in a world dominated by iPods.

Despite Microsoft’s efforts to improve the Zune and expand its features, including introducing touch-screen models, the device failed to gain a significant share of the market.

In 2011, Microsoft officially discontinued the Zune hardware, focusing instead on its Windows Phone platform and digital media software.


The world of technology is rife with fascinating devices that promised innovation and convenience but ultimately failed to achieve lasting success.

Google Glass, Betamax, and the Microsoft Zune are just a few examples of such failures. These devices serve as reminders that even with groundbreaking ideas and significant investment, success in the tech industry is never guaranteed.

Innovation is essential, but understanding market dynamics, user needs, and the competitive landscape is equally crucial for a device to thrive.

Leave a Comment